U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Butler v. Young

Butler v. Young
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 4, 2000

Butler v. Young

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6273

ROBERT E. BUTLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

RICHARD YOUNG; WARDEN HARVEY; RANDOLPH PHIL- LIPS, Assistant Warden of Programs; OFFICER KISER; OFFICER JOHNSON; OFFICER BALDWIN, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-65-7)

Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 4, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert E. Butler, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Robert E. Butler, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that Butler failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal on the reasoning of the district court. See Butler v. Young, No. CA-00-65-7 (W.D. Va. Feb. 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.