U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Watson

United States v. Watson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 3, 2000

United States v. Watson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6241

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

LAUREN ANTHONY WATSON, JR., Petitioner - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-262, CA-98-4125-7)

Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 3, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999) and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no re- versible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil- ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

See United States v. Watson, Nos. CR-97-262; CA-98-4125-7 (D.S.C. Jan. 3 & Feb. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.