U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Thompson v. Pete's Brewing Co

Thompson v. Pete's Brewing Co
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 3, 2000

Thompson v. Pete's Brewing Co

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2647

JAMES M. THOMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

PETE’S BREWING COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98- 1907-MJG)

Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 3, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James M. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Burton John Fishman, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK, & STEWART, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: James M. Thompson appeals the district court’s orders denying relief in Thompson’s age discrimination in employment action and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* See Thompson v. Pete’s Brewing Co., No. CA-98-1907-MJG (D. Md. Oct.

27 & Nov. 10, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Thompson apparently has filed in the district court a motion to supplement the record on appeal. Because this motion is not before this court, we decline to act on it.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.