U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Henry v. Mahn

Henry v. Mahn
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 3, 2000

Henry v. Mahn

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6872

JAMES BILLY HENRY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

DAN MAHN, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-99-175-7)

Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 3, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Billy Henry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: James Billy Henry seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999), for failure to exhaust state court remedies. Because Henry failed to challenge the basis for the district court's ruling in his informal brief, he has not preserved the issue for our review. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Henry v. Mahn, No. CA-99-175- (W.D. Va. June 11, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.