U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Brooks v. US Secretary State

Brooks v. US Secretary State
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 2, 2000

Brooks v. US Secretary State

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1184

AARON H. BROOKS, a/k/a United States Secretary of Congress, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

THE UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF STATE; THE SAID STATE OF MARYLAND; THE GOVERNOR OF THE SAID STATE OF MARYLAND; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE SAID STATE OF MARYLAND; THE EXECUTIVE OF BAL- TIMORE COUNTY; BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPART- MENT; THE BALTIMORE COUNTY LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES; AND ANY AND ALL OTHER SO NAMED PERSONS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-00- 232-MJG)

Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 2, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron H. Brooks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Aaron H. Brooks appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e) (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af- firm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brooks v. United States Secretary of State, No. CA-00-232-MJG (D. Md. Feb. 1, 2000).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.