U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

McCray v. Young

McCray v. Young
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 12, 2000

McCray v. Young

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6373

WAYNE T. MCCRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

R. A. YOUNG; S. K. YOUNG, Chief Warden; MS. JORDAN; G. BAILEY, Doctor; DR. WILSON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-69-7)

Submitted: April 28, 2000 Decided: May 12, 2000

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne T. McCray, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Wayne T. McCray appeals the district court’s orders denying relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McCray v. Young, No. CA-00-69-7 (W.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2000; Feb. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.