UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1124

STEVE NOPPENBERGER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-1742-JFM)

Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steve Noppenberger, Appellant Pro Se. James Joseph Kelley, II, Victoria E. Houck, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Steve Noppenberger appeals the district court’s orders dis- missing the majority of his claims, granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant as to his remaining claim, and denying his motions to withdraw judgment and to compel disclosure or discovery in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the rec- ord and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Noppenberger v. Northrop v. Grumman Corp., No. CA-98-1742-JFM (D.

Md. Dec. 23 & Mar. 25, 1999; Jan. 4, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED