U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Legg v. Gee

Legg v. Gee
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 18, 2000

Legg v. Gee

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6151

WILLIAM ALLEN LEGG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

ARCHIE GEE, Warden; ASSISTANT WARDEN SPANGLER; FERNINAND MASSARI, Doctor; KRIPPA KASHYAP, Doctor; RICHARD CRAIG, Doctor; ROY SWANSON, Lieutenant; HILLARY JOHNSON, Sergeant; ALL LISTED DEFENDANTS IN ORIGINAL SUIT 1998; ALL NEW OR FOUND OUT DEFENDANTS IN THIS SUIT, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 99-3860-DKC)

Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Allen Legg, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: William Allen Legg, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e) (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Legg v. Gee, No. CA- 99-3860-DKC (D. Md. Jan. 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.