U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Johnson v. Alderman

Johnson v. Alderman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 18, 2000

Johnson v. Alderman

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6113

CLARENCE E. JOHNSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

J.R. ALDERMAN, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-99-77-AM)

Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence E. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew P. Dullaghan, OF- FICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Clarence E. Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Johnson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v. Alderman, No. CA-99-77-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 6, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.