U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Franklin v. Boggs

Franklin v. Boggs
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 17, 2000

Franklin v. Boggs

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6341

EARL ANDERSON FRANKLIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

LISA BLUE BOGGS, United States Attorney; N.

CARLTON TILLEY, JR., U. S. District Judge; WALTER C. HOLTON, JR., Assistant United States Attorney, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Dis- trict Judge. (CA-00-157-1)

Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 17, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earl Anderson Franklin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Earl Anderson Franklin appeals the district court’s order de- nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers- ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. See Franklin v. Boggs, No. CA-00-157-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb.

25, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.