U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Melvin

United States v. Melvin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 16, 2000

United States v. Melvin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6287

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

KEVIN JERMAINE MELVIN, a/k/a Baby-Boy, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR-94-139-5-2-F, CA-98-950-5-F)

Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 16, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Jermaine Melvin, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Stuart Wilson, OF- FICE OF THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Kevin Jermaine Melvin appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider a prior order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999) motion. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Melvin, Nos. CR-94-139-5-2-F; CA-98-950-5-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.