Roberts v. Baker
Roberts v. Baker
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6236
JOHNNY CRAWFORD ROBERTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
JOHN H. BAKER, JR., Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-99-769-5-F)
Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 16, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnny Crawford Roberts, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Johnny Crawford Roberts appeals the district court’s order de- nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Roberts’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Roberts v. Baker, No. CA-99-769-5-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.