U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Wooden

United States v. Wooden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 25, 2000

United States v. Wooden

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6460

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

HERMAN WOODEN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-18, CA-96-1591-AM)

Submitted: April 28, 2000 Decided: May 25, 2000

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herman Wooden, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Herman Wooden seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny- ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Wooden’s motions for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Wooden, No. CR-90-18; CA-96-1591-AM (E.D. Va. Mar.

7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.