U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Boyce

United States v. Boyce
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 23, 2000

United States v. Boyce

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7661

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

WILLIAM MARCEL BOYCE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-114, CA-97-357)

Submitted: April 20, 2000 Decided: May 23, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Marcel Boyce, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: William Marcel Boyce seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Boyce, Nos. CR-91-114; CA-97-357 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 8, 1999). We dispense with oral argu- ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.