U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Ho v. West

Ho v. West
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 2, 2000

Ho v. West

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1253

PHILIP Y. HO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

TOGO D. WEST, JR., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-99-529-3)

Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 2, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Philip Y. Ho, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Elizabeth Evans, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Philip Y. Ho appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Defendant in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ho v. West, No. CA-99-529-3 (E.D. Va. Feb. 3 & 4, 2000). We dispense with oral argument be- cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.