UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6340

STEPHEN TSE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

J. E. GUNJA, Warden, United States Bureau of Prisons; M. ALBRIGHT; PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 99-3639-DKC)

Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 6, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Tse, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Stephen Tse appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and denying his Motion for Relief from Judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Tse v. Gunja, No. CA-99-3639-DKC (D. Md. Dec. 21, 1999 & Jan. 11, 2000*). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on January 10, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on January 11, 2000. Pursuant to Rules and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).