U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Kirsch v. Richland County Ctr

Kirsch v. Richland County Ctr
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 6, 2000

Kirsch v. Richland County Ctr

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6301

ROBERT M. KIRSCH, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

RICHLAND COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Medical Department; NFN GUNTLER, Lieutenant; NFN ESKERIDGE, Doctor, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenwood. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-1365-9-17RB)

Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 6, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert M. Kirsch, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, James Miller Davis, Jr., DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Robert M. Kirsch, Jr., appeals the district court’s order de- nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers- ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. See Kirsch v. Richland County Detention Ctr., No. CA- 99-1365-9-17RB (D.S.C. Feb. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.