U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Sheets v. Consolidation Coal

Sheets v. Consolidation Coal
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 5, 2000

Sheets v. Consolidation Coal

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1045

ARZIE SHEETS, Petitioner, versus

CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (98-1609-BLA)

Submitted: May 16, 2000 Decided: June 5, 2000

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

S.F. Raymond Smith, RUNDLE & RUNDLE, L.C., Pineville, West Vir- ginia, for Petitioner. Mary Rich Maloy, JACKSON & KELLY, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Arzie Sheets seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s de- cision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1999). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without revers- ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.

See Sheets v. Consolidation Coal Co., No. 98-1609-BLA (B.R.B. Dec. 1, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.