McCray v. Ringwood
McCray v. Ringwood
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6275
WAYNE T. MCCRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
REBECCA L. RINGWOOD; DOCTOR TOWNSEND; DOCTOR SCHELL, University of Virginia Hospital, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-72-7)
Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 5, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne T. McCray, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Wayne T. McCray appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McCray v. Ringwood, No. CA-00-72-7 (W.D.
Va. Feb. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.