U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Lozano

United States v. Lozano
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 15, 2000

United States v. Lozano

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6093

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JOSE ANTONIO LOZANO, a/k/a Tony, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-97-262, CA-99-265-1)

Submitted: May 31, 2000 Decided: June 15, 2000

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roland Richard Acevedo, SEIFF & KRETZ, New York, New York, for Ap- pellant. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Jose Antonio Lozano seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. See United States v. Lozano, Nos. CR-97-262; CA-99- 265-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.