UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6164

WILLIAM RONALD FORBES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

D. SCOTT DODRILL, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-99-764-5-H)

Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 22, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Ronald Forbes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: William Ronald Forbes appeals the district court’s order deny- ing relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have re- viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Forbes v. Dodrill, No. CA-99-764-5-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2000). We deny Forbes’ motion for appointment of counsel.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED