U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Akbar v. US Parole Comm

Akbar v. US Parole Comm
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 22, 2000

Akbar v. US Parole Comm

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6395

MUHAMMAD JALAL DEEN AKBAR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-99-254-5-HO)

Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 22, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar appeals the district court’s order granting Respondent’s motion for summary judgment on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition, and a subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Akbar v. United States Parole Comm’n, No. CA-99-254-5-HO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 17 & Mar. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.