U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Lancaster v. Potter

Lancaster v. Potter
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 21, 2000

Lancaster v. Potter

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6334

JEFFREY D. LANCASTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

JOHN POTTER, Lieutenant, Defendant - Appellee, and

CRAVEN COUNTY JAIL, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-98-610-5-F)

Submitted: May 23, 2000 Decided: June 21, 2000

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Jeffrey D. Lancaster, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Christopher Hart, SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Jeffrey D. Lancaster appeals the district court’s order deny- ing relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers- ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. See Lancaster v. Potter, No. CA-98-610-5-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.