U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Caldwell v. United States

Caldwell v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 19, 2000

Caldwell v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2522

JUDITH E. CALDWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-99-207-A)

Submitted: May 19, 2000 Decided: June 19, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Judith E. Caldwell, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Parker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Judith E. Caldwell appeals the district court’s order (1) granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action challenging an adverse employment action and raising a claim under the Rehabilitation Act; and (2) denying her motion for reconsid- eration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Caldwell v. United States, No. CA-99-207-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 21 & Oct. 4, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.