U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

In re: Stephens v.

In re: Stephens v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 26, 2000

In re: Stephens v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6599

In Re: THOMAS CARVER STEPHENS, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-98-83)

Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 26, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Carver Stephens, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Thomas Carver Stephens petitions this court for a writ of mandamus and requests that we stay district court proceedings in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) action. The district court has entered a final order denying relief on Stephens’ § 2255 motion. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dismiss the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.