U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Howard v. Stowe

Howard v. Stowe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 26, 2000

Howard v. Stowe

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6525

MAURICE VERSHAWN HOWARD, a/k/a Moe, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

RICKY STOWE; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-99-662-3)

Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 26, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice VerShawn Howard, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Maurice VerShawn Howard appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea- soning of the district court. See Howard v. Stowe, No. CA-99-662-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.