U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Anderson v. Angelone

Anderson v. Angelone
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 26, 2000

Anderson v. Angelone

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6591

RICARDO ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE; FRANK RAWLINGS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-215-7)

Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 26, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricardo Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ricardo Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil action, which the district court properly construed as a 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Anderson v. Angelone, No. CA-00-215-7 (W.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.