U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Alston v. Lawrence

Alston v. Lawrence
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 26, 2000

Alston v. Lawrence

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6579

EDWIN ALSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

OFFICER LAWRENCE; LIEUTENANT BUSH; WARDEN RUSHTON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-99-244-9-19RB)

Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 26, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edwin Alston, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, BURNS, MCDONALD, BRADFORD, PATRICK & TINSLEY, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Edwin Alston appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his civil rights com- plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Alston v. Lawrence, No. CA-99-244-9-19RB (D.S.C. Apr. 3, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.