U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Watson v. Weldon

Watson v. Weldon
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 10, 2000

Watson v. Weldon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6155

ROBERT WATSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

WILLIE WELDON, Warden; STEVE J. LENSES, Doctor, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-99-1006-2-22)

Submitted: June 13, 2000 Decided: July 10, 2000

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Watson, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Senn, Charleston, South Carolina; Jackson L. Barwick, Jr., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Robert Watson appeals the district court’s order denying re- lief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Watson v. Weldon, No. CA-99-1006-2-22 (D.S.C. Jan. 18, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.