U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Russell v. Paramont Coal Co

Russell v. Paramont Coal Co
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 10, 2000

Russell v. Paramont Coal Co

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1993

RALPH RUSSELL, Petitioner, versus

PARAMONT COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (98-1153-BLA)

Submitted: June 20, 2000 Decided: July 10, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ralph Russell, Petitioner Pro Se. Harry Ashby Dickerson, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia; Patricia May Nece, Jeffrey Steven Goldberg, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ralph Russell seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s de- cision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without revers- ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.

See Russell v. Paramont Coal Co, BRB No. 98-1153-BLA (B.R.B. May 26, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.