U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Riley v. State of SC

Riley v. State of SC
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 21, 2000

Riley v. State of SC

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6291

NATHANIEL C. RILEY, II, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLIE CONDON, At- torney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-728-9-20-RB)

Submitted: July 13, 2000 Decided: July 21, 2000

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel C. Riley, II, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Nathaniel C. Riley, II, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Riley v. South Carolina, No. CA-99-728-9-20-RB (D.S.C. Jan. 28, 2000). In light of this dispo- sition, we deny Riley’s “Motion to Vacate.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.