U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Morrison v. Arrisueno

Morrison v. Arrisueno
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 19, 2000

Morrison v. Arrisueno

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6148

ANDREW A. MORRISON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

JUAN ARRISUENO, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 99-2718-PJM)

Submitted: June 30, 2000 Decided: July 19, 2000

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew A. Morrison, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Evan Blumenfield, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Andrew A. Morrison appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.A.

§ 1983 (West Supp. 2000) action. We have reviewed the district court’s order dismissing the action and find no reversible error.

See Morrison v. Arrisueno, No. CA-99-2718-PJM (D. Md. Dec. 27, 1999; & Feb. 3, 2000); see also Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976); Miltier v. Beorn, 896 F.2d 848, 851 (4th Cir. 1990). Ac- cordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.