U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Ellis v. DOWCP

Ellis v. DOWCP
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 19, 2000

Ellis v. DOWCP

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1211

DONNIE ELLIS, Petitioner, versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; ARCH OF WEST VIRGINIA/AMHERST COAL COMPANY, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (99-273-BLA)

Submitted: July 13, 2000 Decided: July 19, 2000

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donnie Ellis, Petitioner Pro Se. Patricia May Nece, Jennifer U.

Toth, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Mary Rich Maloy, JACKSON & KELLY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Donnie Ellis seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Ellis v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Pro- grams, No. 99-0273-BLA (B.R.B. Nov. 26, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade- quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.