Temple v. Day
Temple v. Day
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6614
DANIEL TEMPLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
DANIEL R. DAY, in his individual capacity and official capacity, Defendant - Appellee.
No. 00-6615
DANIEL TEMPLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
OCONEE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; KENNY WASHINGTON, Lieutenant with Oconee County Sheriff’s Department; DEAN HALL, Judge, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-3486-4-13BF, CA-00-598-4-13BF, CA-00-599-4-13BF) Submitted: July 13, 2000 Decided: July 25, 2000
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Temple, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Daniel Temple appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his two civil rights complaints. We have re- viewed the record and the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Temple v. Day, No. CA-99-3486-4-13BF (D.S.C. Apr. 6, 2000); Temple v. Oconee County Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. CA-00-598-4- 13BF (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.