United States v. Mosley
United States v. Mosley
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7403
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
MONTE CLAY MOSLEY, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-95-16, CA-98-684-7)
Submitted: June 6, 2000 Decided: July 24, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monte Clay Mosley, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OF- FICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Monte Clay Mosley seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Mosley, Nos. CR-95-16; CA-98-684-7 (W.D. Va. Sept. 14, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.