U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Phillips

United States v. Phillips
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 3, 2000

United States v. Phillips

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6387

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JAMES MICHAEL PHILLIPS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-29-P, CA-99-11-P)

Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: August 3, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Michael Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OF- FICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: James Michael Phillips seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Phillips, Nos. CR-94- 29-P; CA-99-11-P (W.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.