U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Hembry v. Angelone

Hembry v. Angelone
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 3, 2000

Hembry v. Angelone

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6410

ANDREW HEMBRY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-99-784)

Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: August 3, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Hembry, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Andrew Hembry appeals the district court’s order denying re- lief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000), and a subsequent order denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court's orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Hembry v. Angelone, No. CA- 99-784 (E.D. Va. Mar. 14 & Apr. 21, 2000). We further deny Hembry’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.