Hampton v. Turlington
Hampton v. Turlington
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6327
WILBERT EUGENE HAMPTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
CATHERINE TURLINGTON, Doctor; EASTERN SHORE EYE CENTER; JOHN FOLEY, Doctor; RITE AID PHARMACY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-00-118-2)
Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: August 3, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wilbert Eugene Hampton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Wilbert Eugene Hampton appeals the district court’s order de- nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hampton v. Turlington, No. CA-00-118-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.