U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Dalton v. School Board Norfolk

Dalton v. School Board Norfolk
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 1, 2000

Dalton v. School Board Norfolk

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1131

BRADLY G. DALTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

SCHOOL BOARD OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK, Defendant - Appellee, and

ROY NICHOLS, Former Superintendent; JOHN SMITH, School Administrator; PAMELA RIDDICK, School Administrator; CATHY LASSITER, School Administrator; ANN HALL, School Administrator, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-98-975-2)

Submitted: July 14, 2000 Decided: August 1, 2000

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bradly G. Dalton, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel R. Hagemeister, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Bradly G. Dalton appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the School Board of the City of Norfolk in this action alleging a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea- soning of the district court. See Dalton v. School Bd. of Norfolk, No. CA-98-975-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.