U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Payne-El

United States v. Payne-El
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 7, 2000

United States v. Payne-El

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6672

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

SHERMAN DARRELL PAYNE-EL, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge. (CR-78-24-Y, CA-99-2852-Y)

Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: August 7, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherman Darrell Payne-El, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Sherman Payne-El seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Payne-El, Nos. CR-78-24-Y; CA-99-2852- Y (D. Md. Mar. 9, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.