United States v. MacKinnon
United States v. MacKinnon
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-4360
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
DARRIN W. MACKINNON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CR-00-12)
Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 29, 2000
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrin W. MacKinnon, Appellant Pro Se. Florencio John Yuzon, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Darrin W. MacKinnon appeals the district court’s order af- firming the magistrate judge’s ruling finding MacKinnon guilty of speeding on a naval base and imposing a $100 fine and a $5 special assessment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. MacKinnon, No. CR-00-12 (E.D. Va. Apr. 27, 2000).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on April 25, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on April 27, 2000. Pursuant to Rules and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was physically entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision.
See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.