U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Anyanwutaku v. Fleet Mortgage

Anyanwutaku v. Fleet Mortgage
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 28, 2000

Anyanwutaku v. Fleet Mortgage

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1353

KINGSLEY ANYANWUTAKU, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

FLEET MORTGAGE GROUP, INCORPORATED; HOUSEHOLD MORTGAGE SERVICES; SHAPIRO & BURSON; JOHN S.

BURSON; WILLIAM M. SAVAGE; RON BROWN, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CR-99-1104-AW)

Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 28, 2000

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kingsley Anyanwutaku, Appellant Pro Se. Santiago Ricardo Narvaiz, LAW OFFICES OF S. RICARDO NARVAIZ, Fairfax, Virginia; Peter Henrik Gunst, ASTRACHAN, GUNST, GOLDMAN & THOMAS, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Kingsley Anyanwutaku appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his suit challenging a foreclosure. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Anyanwutaku v. Fleet Mortgage Group, No. CA-99-1104-AW (D. Md. Feb. 24, 2000). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.