Quiller v. Dion
Quiller v. Dion
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6617
EVERETTE N. QUILLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GREG DION; JOSEPH WHITMORE, Sergeant,
Defendants -Appellees,
and
JOE MCQUEEN,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-220-5-BR-2)
Submitted: August 30, 2000 Decided: September 7, 2000
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Everette N. Quiller, Appellant Pro Se. Edwin Constant Bryson, Jr., PATTERSON, DILTHEY, CLAY & BRYSON, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Everette N. Quiller appeals the district court’s order grant-
ing summary judgment to Appellees on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West
Supp. 2000) action. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Quiller v. Dion, No. CA-99-220-5-BR-2
(E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished