Queen v. Battaglia

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Queen v. Battaglia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6708

SAMUEL ROBERT QUEEN, JR., a/k/a Bobby J. Queen,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LYNNE ANN BATTAGLIA; BARBARA S. SKALLA; STEPHEN S. ZIMMERMAN; ROBERT D. SHEEHY; EFRAIN ROSERIO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98- 3568-MJG)

Submitted: August 30, 2000 Decided: September 7, 2000

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Robert Queen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Roann Nichols, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Samuel R. Queen appeals the district court’s order denying his

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) to alter or amend its order granting summary

judgment to Appellees on his Bivens* action. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. We further find that this appeal, Queen’s fourth case con-

cerning essentially the same property as his previous appeals,

lacks any arguable basis in law or fact. Accordingly, we dismiss

this appeal as frivolous. See

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915

(e)(2) (West Supp.

2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* Bivens v. Six Named Unknown Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 338

(1971).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished