Jones v. Wal-Mart Associates
Jones v. Wal-Mart Associates
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1466
ROESETTE H. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED, DC 6040, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District or North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-99-216-7-F)
Submitted: August 30, 2000 Decided: September 6, 2000
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roesette H. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Todd Sullivan, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Roesette H. Jones appeals the district court’s order dismiss- ing her civil action alleging racial discrimination in violation of Title VII. See 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Wal-Mart, No. CA-99-216-7-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.