U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Clark v. Ericksons Ashland

Clark v. Ericksons Ashland
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 6, 2000

Clark v. Ericksons Ashland

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1825

MICHAEL CRAIG CLARK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

ERICKSONS ASHLAND; TOMS MOBIL; ST. BRENDAN CATHOLIC CHURCH; FAITH BAPTIST CHURCH; FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH; LANDMARK BAPTIST CHURCH; GRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH; HOLY TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH; PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH DAVIS MEMORIAL; DESTINY TABERNACLE OF PRAISE; CHURCH OF GOD; CHURCH OF CHRIST; FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST; FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE; SEVENTH DAY AD- VENTIST CHURCH; ELKINS CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN; OTTERBEIN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH; WOODFORD MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH; FAITH FOUR- SQUARE CHURCH, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-51-2)

Submitted: August 30, 2000 Decided: September 6, 2000

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Craig Clark, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Michael Craig Clark appeals the district court’s order dis- missing his civil action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 1915 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Clark v. Ericksons Ashland, No. CA-00-51-2 (N.D.W. Va. June 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.