Via v. Daughtry

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Via v. Daughtry

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6455

GEORGE VIA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

D. DAUGHTRY, Correctional Officer; P. HAR- RISON, Supervising Lieutenant,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; D. A. GARRAGHTY, Warden, Greensville Correctional Center,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-99-176-2)

Submitted: September 8, 2000 Decided: September 15, 2000

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Via, Appellant Pro Se. Rick Randall Linker, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

George Via appeals the district court’s orders denying relief

on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Via v. Daughtry, No. CA-99-176-2 (E.D. Va.

Aug. 26, 1999, & Mar. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished