Via v. Daughtry
Via v. Daughtry
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6455
GEORGE VIA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
D. DAUGHTRY, Correctional Officer; P. HAR- RISON, Supervising Lieutenant,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; D. A. GARRAGHTY, Warden, Greensville Correctional Center,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-99-176-2)
Submitted: September 8, 2000 Decided: September 15, 2000
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Via, Appellant Pro Se. Rick Randall Linker, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
George Via appeals the district court’s orders denying relief
on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Via v. Daughtry, No. CA-99-176-2 (E.D. Va.
Aug. 26, 1999, & Mar. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished