Hubbard v. Painter

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Hubbard v. Painter

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6476

DAVID RAY HUBBARD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

HOWARD PAINTER, Warden, Mount Olive Correc- tional Complex,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-328-5)

Submitted: August 31, 2000 Decided: September 15, 2000

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Ray Hubbard, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Leah Perry Macia, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

David Ray Hubbard seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to

proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motion for a certificate of

appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. See Hubbard v. Painter, No. CA-99-328-5 (S.D.W. Va.

Mar. 6, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished