Malik v. Henderson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Malik v. Henderson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2339

SHAZADI MALIK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-98-1728-A)

Submitted: May 31, 2000 Decided: September 14, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond William Konan, R.W. KONAN & ASSOCIATES, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Gary K. Springstead, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; R. Andrew German, Managing Counsel, Stephan J. Boardman, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Shazadi Malik appeals the district court’s order granting the

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on her complaint alleging

national origin discrimination and retaliation. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Malik v. Henderson, No. CA-98-1728-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 7,

1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on September 3, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on September 7, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray,

806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35

(4th Cir. 1986).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished