Childress v. Appalachian Power Co
Childress v. Appalachian Power Co
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1193
WALTER E. CHILDRESS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
BARRY L. SNODGRASS, Appalachian Power Company Division Manager, Lynchburg Division,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CA-94-46-L)
Submitted: July 31, 2000 Decided: September 14, 2000
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter E. Childress, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Kenneth Friedman, Thomas Meredith Winn, III, WOODS, ROGERS & HAZELGROVE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Walter L. Childress appeals the district court’s order grant-
ing Appalachian Power Company’s motion for summary judgment in his
claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Childress v. Appalachian Power Co., No. CA-94-46-L
(W.D. Va. Jan. 13, 2000). We deny Childress’ motion for appoint-
ment of counsel, and dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished